Want to avoid creating legal exposure through AI in the workplace? We can help.

AI is already screening candidates, building rosters, summarising documents, writing letters and flagging performance in Australian workplaces. The law hasn't stopped; it continues to progress and December 2026 sees transparency requirements imposed on businesses covered by the Privact Act 1988 (Cth). We help employers use these tools with safeguards in place.

Book a conversation

Workplace law based in Toowoomba and Brisbane.

The legal questions arrive with technology

Most employers adopt AI for good reasons. It saves time, takes the grind out of shortlisting and rostering and everyone else seems to be doing it. The trouble is that an AI tool doesn't change who is legally responsible for the decision it produces. You are.

That responsibility sits across privacy, discrimination, work health and safety and employment law all at once. We bring those together, because in practice they arrive as one problem.

Coming into effect

The deadline that's already running

From 10 December 2026, new transparency obligations under the Privacy Act require covered businesses to disclose, in their privacy policy, where personal information is used in computer programs that make — or substantially assist in making — decisions that could significantly affect a person.

10 December 2026

Automated decision-making transparency obligations commence

In an employment context, that can reach further than employers expect: AI-assisted shortlisting, automated rostering, and systems that flag performance or conduct issues may all be caught, depending on how they're used and what turns on the outcome.

It's a disclosure obligation rather than a ban — you don't have to stop using the tools. But you do need to know which of your systems are in scope, and your privacy policy needs to say so before the date. We can work that out with you.

Where AI creates legal risk at work

An AI tool doesn't change who is responsible for the decision. These are the areas where we see employers exposed.

Recruitment & discrimination

Screening and ranking tools can filter people out on grounds you'd never apply deliberately. If a tool produces a discriminatory outcome, that's your exposure, not the vendor's.

Automated decisions & transparency

From 10 December 2026, covered businesses must disclose qualifying automated decision-making in their privacy policy. First you need to know which of your systems are caught.

Monitoring & surveillance

Cameras, tracking, biometric time clocks and productivity software all collect personal information and the rules differ depending on where your people work.

Algorithmic management

Managing people by dashboard — targets, scores and automated warnings — can create psychosocial risk that sits squarely within your work health and safety duties.

Staff use of generative AI

Your people are already using these tools. Without a clear policy, confidential information, client data and your own intellectual property can walk out the door in a prompt.

Performance & dismissal decisions

If a system contributed to a decision to discipline or dismiss, employers should take caution and consider transparency and the impact on any future employee-based claim.